Saturday, April 29, 2006

Things Looking Bad For Rep. Ney


The Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal is readying to claim another scalp.

The Washington Post reports that federal prosecutors are expanding the range of charges being contemplated against a congressman who has previously been linked to the scandal.

Federal prosecutors signaled this week that they have decided to pursue a wide range of allegations about dealings between Rep. Robert W. Ney (R-Ohio) and lobbyist Jack Abramoff, rather than bringing a narrowly focused bribery case against the congressman...

Court papers filed in recent months show that prosecutors have lined up at least four cooperating witnesses against the Ohio congressman: Abramoff, former congressional aides Michael Scanlon and Tony C. Rudy, and businessman Adam Kidan. All have pleaded guilty to various conspiracy, fraud or public corruption charges.

The court filings that accompanied the plea agreements of Abramoff, Scanlon and Rudy accused Ney of accepting "a stream of things of value" in exchange for official actions.


Ney had first been fingered as providing political cover for Abramoff and an associate in a dodgy cruise ship purchase, which later featured a gangland-style hit on the seller.

Ney was also involved with Abramoff and his lobbying team on other issues under federal investigation. In 2002, Ney sponsored legislation at the team's request to reopen a casino for a Texas Indian tribe that Abramoff represented, and approved a 2002 license for an Abramoff client to wire the House of Representatives for mobile phone service.

At the same time, Ney accepted many favors from Abramoff, among them campaign contributions, dinners at the lobbyist's downtown restaurant, skybox fundraisers -- including one at his then-MCI Center box the month after Boulis's murder -- and a lavish golf junket to Scotland in August 2002.

Ney was directly implicated by three of the four who pleaded guilty to conspiracy and bribery charges: Abramoff, Scanlon and Rudy. Kidan's attorney said his client also would testify against Ney if asked.


There is all sorts of debate about what effect a possible indictment of Ney will have upon his chances for re-election in the Fall midterms:

Democrats acknowledge privately that the only way they can win in this Republican-leaning district, which President Bush carried with 57 percent in 2004, is for the election to be a referendum on Ney. He has vowed to remain in the race even if he is indicted.


Unless Ney does something rash--like withdraw from the race--he is almost assured of victory.

One must not forget that we are dealing with Ohio here, the posterboy for electronic voting technology.





<< Home